On Monday, Verizon Wireless announced its entry into the market for femtocells, small home cell sites expressly designed to allow mobile phones to place calls within a 5000 Square foot radius.  This creates a Mini Cell Site.

Verizon’s “Network Extender” device is priced at $249.99, a flat fee that will not be supplemented – or subsidized – by any monthly pricing. The device is manufactured by Samsung.

Sprint also provides a similar device, the Airrave, while T-Mobile’s HotSpot@Home uses Wi-Fi to connect its handsets. To date, AT&T has not announced a femtocell offering, but is currently testing 3G MicroCell.

Verizon uses the home’s broadband connection as a backhaul, essentially translating the cellular call into a VOIP connection. Who needs it? People in rural areas that may live on the outskirts of a cell site. One drawback: EV-DO is not supported, including those services that depend on it.

Using the Network Extender doesn’t incur additional monthly charges, however, users will be charged against their plan, in minutes, for any calls they make.

The service is open to Verizon customers as well as Family Share Plan members, the company said. But Verizon customers can also use a built-in management program on the Wireless Network Extender to prevent neighboring Verizon subscribers from placing unauthorized calls.

The Wireless Network Extender will be available from Verizon Wireless stores and through its Web site, the company said.

The IRIS payload from Cisco is carried by the Intelsat 14 satellite launched on 23 November 2009. The payload was powered up in orbit on 1 December, followed by network testing beginning on 17 December 2009 before the IRIS capability became operational.

Unlike previous satellite communications (SATCOM), IRIS allows the routing of IP packets in orbit across satellite beams. NC3A cites one of the advantages of IRIS over conventional satellite technology as being that it can route data between ground users covered by different satellite beams in a single satellite hop, thus reducing transponder use and increasing efficiency. Furthermore, the payload regenerates the received signals, improving the end-to-end signal performance and allowing a reduction in the size of sending and receiving terminals. IRIS will provide users with a mobile network allowing them to connect and communicate how, when and where they want, and that continuously adapts to their requirements without reliance on a predefined, fixed infrastructure, according to NC3A.   It essentially forms the backbone of a network for mobile Internet access anywhere in the world. Finally, the software of the router and onboard modem can be upgraded from the ground, increasing the flexibility of the system to implement future waveform and router standards.

NASA’s T.J. Creamer did the first tweet directly from space. At approximately 3:38 a.m. EST Friday, he wrote the first message ever posted directly to Twitter. “Hello Twitterverse!,” wrote Creamer, under the user name Astro_TJ.

NASA astronauts have posted Twitter messages in the past, but they first had to be relayed to Mission Control. Now, residents of the ISS can post directly to the micro-blogging site thanks to a new, direct Internet connection.

Creamer’s Twitter followers are becoming legion. He had about 5,000 followers on Friday, but that number had mushroomed to more than 22,000 as of Sunday.

The average Internet download speed in the U.S. is slower than that in 27 other countries, according to a new report by the Communications Workers of America.

Web surfing in the U.S. averages around 5.1 megabits per second (mbps), lagging far behind top-ranked South Korea, where speeds average more than 20 mbps. In 2007, the U.S. download speed was 3.5 mbps, inching up only 1.6 mbps since then. At that rate, notes the report, it will take the U.S. 15 years to catch up with South Korea.

The report discovered that Internet users who live in the Northeast or Mid-Atlantic regions enjoy faster speeds than those in the South or West. The five fastest states included Delaware (9.9 mbps), Rhode Island (9.8 mbps), New Jersey (8.9 mbps), Massachusetts (8.6 mbps), and New York (8.4 mbps).

States on the slow end were Mississippi (3.7 mbps), South Carolina (3.6 mbps), Arkansas (3.1 mbps), Idaho (2.6 mbps), and Alaska (2.3 mbps).

“Every American should have affordable access to high-speed Internet, no matter where they live. This is essential to economic growth and will help maintain our global competitiveness,” said Larry Cohen, president of the Communications Workers of America. “Unfortunately, fragmented government programs and uneven private sector responses to build out Internet access have left a digital divide across the country.”

The U.S. is the only country without a national policy to promote high-speed Internet access, noted the report. But that may be about to change.

Signed earlier this year, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act includes a provision for a national broadband plan by spring of next year and grants of $7.2 billion to bring high-speed Internet to rural and remote locations across the country.

That’s a step in the right direction, said the CWA. But the organization would like to see more specific improvements.

In the report, the CWA called for such measures as an Internet infrastructure with enough capacity for 10 mbps downstream and 1 mbps upstream by 2010, tax incentives for businesses to provide faster speeds, and grants to provide computers and broadband equipment to low-income households.

The 2009 report was compiled using data from the CWA’s latest Speed Matters test, which measures the time it takes to communicate with the nearest server on the Net. Gathered from May 2008 to May 2009, the test tracked the speed of more than 413,000 Internet users.

Source:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10317118-38.html?tag=delicious

I am on the fence on this one.  Being a parent I see the benefit of me subscribing to a service or service provider that filters its content so I don’t need to or know how to.  Products that come to mind are Cyber Sitter, Net Nanny or equivalent..  On the other hand, I believe in education.  I need to teach my children about the internet.  There may be situations I need access to information out there that may be blocked for my children not for me. 

Is it possible to get both? I think yes. I don’t think service providers should block content without letting me know in advance.  This is so I can decide if their service is good for me.  If they are going to offer this service, let people know, or offer two types of services.  Let the free market decide.  I don’t have a problem with them prioritizing traffic, or de-prioritizing traffic as the case might be.  I dont mind them requiring you to relay your outbound mail through their server.  I think those help the net in general and it is the obligation of the provider to protect them self.

Intelletrace Offers Dedicated (unshared no aggregation) direct internet access to the internet.  This is how I believe it should be done, this is what we advertise.  This is what we do. 

Why this blog?  this is a post from the Washington Post regarding the following article.

FCC looks at ways to assert authority over Web access

As a recent court hearing and industry opposition have cast doubt on its power over Web service providers.
The FCC, which regulates public access to telephone and television services, has been working to claim the same role for the Internet. The stakes are high, as the Obama administration pushes an agenda of open broadband access for all and big corporations work to protect their enormous investments in a new and powerful medium.
“This is a pivotal moment,” said Ben Scott, director of policy at the public interest group Free Press. The government wants to treat broadband Internet as a national infrastructure, he said, like phone lines or the broadcast spectrum. But federal regulators are grappling with older policies that do not clearly protect consumers’ access to the Web, their privacy or prices of service.
The issue may have reached a turning point last week when a federal appeals court questioned the limits of the FCC’s authority in a 2008 case involving Comcast. The agency had ordered the Internet and cable giant to stop blocking subscribers’ access to the online file-sharing service BitTorrent. But in an oral hearing last Friday, three judges grilled an FCC lawyer over whether the agency had acted outside the scope of its authority.
The appeals court is still hearing the case, but analysts predict that the FCC will lose and that the ruling could throw all of its efforts to oversee Internet access into question. A loss could undermine the legality of FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski’s push for policies that would prohibit service providers from restricting customers’ access to legal Web content — the concept known as net neutrality — and throw into doubt the agency’s ability to oversee pricing and competition among Internet service providers.

Femtocells are low-power wireless access points that operate in licensed spectrum to connect standard mobile devices to a mobile operator’s network broadband connections to the internet.  Wikipedia Definition

Requirements to use a femtocell.

• Broadband Intenet connection  with at least 1.5Mbps down/256kbps up.
• femtocell device
• Spare Ethernet port on Lan

Domestic US Providers of Femtocel. (Not a complete list Let me know of additional and I will update this post.)

• AT&T 3G MicroCell (Not in all areas yet).
• Sprint AIRAVE
• Verizon Wireless Network Extender
• Magic Jack ( Sort of, but close enough if the FCC dosent kill it) (Q1 2010)